These rules explain how Vividenz researches, explains, translates, reviews, and updates health information. They are a public working commitment—not a claim that the content is error-free or medically certified.
Updated 14 September 2026
01
Purpose and responsibility
Vividenz provides general health education. Its content is not personal advice, diagnosis, treatment, or emergency care.
Vitali Dieter is the founder, host, and person with editorial responsibility. He is not a physician, therapist, or dietitian. He deliberately approves new and changed content before publication.
02
Which sources take priority
Priority goes to current information from public-health institutions and professional societies, evidence-based guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Peer-reviewed individual studies may supplement them when needed for a specific claim.
Links should lead as directly as possible to the original or authoritative publication. Popular reports, company pages, and social media are not used as the sole evidence for health claims.
03
Evidence, context, and uncertainty
Where possible, Vividenz separates established knowledge, plausible biological explanations, and practical interpretation. Observational, animal, or laboratory findings are not presented as proven effects in humans.
Conflicting results, limited applicability, ranges, and important risks are stated. Numbers receive context; relative effects should not stand without an understandable frame.
04
AI and six language versions
AI supports outlines, draft wording, translations, and technical implementation. It is not a medical source, does not decide what gets published, and replaces neither reliable evidence nor human responsibility.
German is the editorial source version. US and British English, Spanish, French, and Brazilian Portuguese are adapted for language and context. Medical boundaries and regional emergency pathways are checked for each language area; meaningful differences should never arise silently.
05
Updates and corrections
Articles display the date of their source or editorial review. They are reviewed regularly and when circumstances call for it, such as important new guidelines, safety information, or valid feedback.
Factual errors are corrected promptly. Substantial changes receive an updated date and a traceable note in the article. Readers may send correction notices through the contact page at any time.
06
Commercial independence
Commissions, partnerships, or product interests must not determine source selection, health claims, or necessary limitations. Compensated links are labelled directly as affiliate links or advertising links.
Health articles remain ad-free: they do not contain product boxes, buying buttons, or paid product recommendations. Affiliate links appear only on the clearly labelled recommendations page or in explicitly marked areas.
Vividenz uses first sparing Amazon affiliate links on the resources page. There are no product placements inside health articles, no Vividenz checkout, and no additional embedded affiliate-tracking script on the website.
Quality assurance workflow
Six checkpoints before and after publication.
01
QUESTION
Define a focused health question and the article's boundaries.
02
RESEARCH
Find robust sources and assess their currency and evidentiary weight.
03
DRAFT
Explain the connections clearly without overstating certainty.
04
CHECK
Compare claims, sources, numbers, risks, and medical limitations.
05
APPROVE
Deliberately approve the text, metadata, and language versions.
06
MAINTAIN
Review feedback and new evidence, then make corrections visible.
Methodological orientation
Guided by recognized quality principles.
Vividenz draws on publicly described principles for evidence-based health information. This does not imply certification, partnership, or review by the institutions named below.
Please name the page, the specific passage, and—if possible—a reliable source. Vividenz will review the notice; email is not medical advice and is not suitable for emergencies.